Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      In this paper, I expand my claim that technological advances are significantly altering self-definition and relationship. I address the mixed reactions to the concept of perversion and argue that, despite its problematics, the term should be retained. I respond to Kieffer’s and Coen’s request for additional clinical material and highlight Hartman’s many misreadings of my paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Psychoanalytic Dialogues is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Long Island University
    • ISSN:
      1048-1885
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178
    • Accession Number:
      108866681
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      KNAFO, D. Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 4, p. 524–531, 2015. DOI 10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=108866681. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Knafo D. Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2015;25(4):524-531. doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178
    • APA:
      Knafo, D. (2015). Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25(4), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Knafo, Danielle. 2015. “Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 25 (4): 524–31. doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178.
    • Harvard:
      Knafo, D. (2015) ‘Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25(4), pp. 524–531. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Knafo, D 2015, ‘Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 524–531, viewed 23 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Knafo, Danielle. “Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 25, no. 4, July 2015, pp. 524–531. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Knafo, Danielle. “Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 25, no. 4 (July 2015): 524–31. doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1055178.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Knafo D. Technology, Perversion, and Dehumanization: Response to Discussions of My Paper. Psychoanalytic Dialogues [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2020 Nov 23];25(4):524–31. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=108866681