The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Knafo, Danielle (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Psychoanalytic Perspectives. 2020, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p53-56. 4p.
  • Document Type:
    Article
  • Subject Terms:
  • Additional Information
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      erotic transference
      perversion.
      psychoanalysis
      sexuality
    • Abstract:
      In this paper, I respond to the discussions to my case presentation. I address what I have learned from my case and what I found helpful in the discussions. I also discuss the topic of termination as one that exists throughout our work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Psychoanalytic Perspectives is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Full Text Word Count:
      1461
    • ISSN:
      1551-806X
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311
    • Accession Number:
      141048649
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      KNAFO, D. The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 53–56, 2020. DOI 10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=141048649. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Knafo D. The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark. Psychoanalytic Perspectives. 2020;17(1):53-56. doi:10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311
    • APA:
      Knafo, D. (2020). The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Knafo, Danielle. 2020. “The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark.” Psychoanalytic Perspectives 17 (1): 53–56. doi:10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311.
    • Harvard:
      Knafo, D. (2020) ‘The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark’, Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17(1), pp. 53–56. doi: 10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Knafo, D 2020, ‘The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark’, Psychoanalytic Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53–56, viewed 23 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Knafo, Danielle. “The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark.” Psychoanalytic Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 53–56. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Knafo, Danielle. “The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark.” Psychoanalytic Perspectives 17, no. 1 (January 2020): 53–56. doi:10.1080/1551806X.2019.1685311.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Knafo D. The Imperfect Art of Psychoanalysis: Response to Dianne Elise and Robert Grossmark. Psychoanalytic Perspectives [Internet]. 2020 Jan [cited 2020 Nov 23];17(1):53–6. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=141048649