IN DEFENCE OF NATURAL DAYLIGHT.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • NAICS/Industry Codes:
      335129 Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing
    • Abstract:
      Objects appear different as the illumination under which they are perceived varies. This fact is sometimes thought to pose a problem for the view that colours are mind-independent properties: if a coloured object appears different under different illuminations, then under which illumination does the object appear the colour it really is? I argue that given the nature of natural daylight, and certain plausible assumptions about the nature of the colours it illuminates, there is a non-arbitrary reason to suppose that it is under natural daylight that we are able to perceive the real colours of objects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Department of Philosophy
University of York
    • ISSN:
      0279-0750
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x
    • Accession Number:
      48345910
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      ALLEN, K. In Defence of Natural Daylight. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 91, n. 1, p. 1–18, 2010. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=48345910. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      ALLEN K. In Defence of Natural Daylight. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 2010;91(1):1-18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x
    • APA:
      ALLEN, K. (2010). In Defence of Natural Daylight. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      ALLEN, KEITH. 2010. “In Defence of Natural Daylight.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x.
    • Harvard:
      ALLEN, K. (2010) ‘In Defence of Natural Daylight’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      ALLEN, K 2010, ‘In Defence of Natural Daylight’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–18, viewed 29 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      ALLEN, KEITH. “In Defence of Natural Daylight.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 91, no. 1, Mar. 2010, pp. 1–18. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      ALLEN, KEITH. “In Defence of Natural Daylight.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91, no. 1 (March 2010): 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2009.01355.x.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      ALLEN K. In Defence of Natural Daylight. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2020 Nov 29];91(1):1–18. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=48345910