Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      This discussion responds to questions and comments made by Stefanie Solow-Glennon and Jean Wolff Bernstein. Here I further clarify different types of solitude and their connection to creativity and pathology. Many solitary individuals, creative and otherwise, are involved in a project that for them may be their most significant relationship. I speak about how culture shapes attitudes of aloneness and relationship, and I give examples from art (Frida Kahlo) and therapy (Morita Therapy) to illustrate the various functions of solitude. Finally I address ways that solitude works in therapy and how the necessary power differential places the analyst in a special place of aloneness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Psychoanalytic Dialogues is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Long Island University
    • ISSN:
      1048-1885
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/10481885.2012.646612
    • Accession Number:
      71813600
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      KNAFO, D. Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 83–92, 2012. DOI 10.1080/10481885.2012.646612. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=71813600. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Knafo D. Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2012;22(1):83-92. doi:10.1080/10481885.2012.646612
    • APA:
      Knafo, D. (2012). Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.646612
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Knafo, Danielle. 2012. “Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 22 (1): 83–92. doi:10.1080/10481885.2012.646612.
    • Harvard:
      Knafo, D. (2012) ‘Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(1), pp. 83–92. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2012.646612.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Knafo, D 2012, ‘Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries’, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 83–92, viewed 28 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Knafo, Danielle. “Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 83–92. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/10481885.2012.646612.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Knafo, Danielle. “Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 22, no. 1 (January 2012): 83–92. doi:10.1080/10481885.2012.646612.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Knafo D. Solitude and Relatedness: A Wily and Complex Twinship: Reply to Commentaries. Psychoanalytic Dialogues [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2020 Nov 28];22(1):83–92. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=71813600